New fraudulent presidential election in the United States. Popular insurrection and democratic restoration

New fraudulent presidential election in the United States. Popular insurrection and democratic restoration

Felipe Pérez Martí*

October 15, 2024. Edited on October 26, 2024.

1. Motivation: The prophecy of civil war in the United States.

In this article I make three strong predictions, based on entirely rational arguments. The first is that the Deep State will continue to rule in the United States. In this context, one of the scenarios is that Kamala Harris will be fraudulently imposed as president. In the other, Donald Trump would be assassinated, even after being elected in the upcoming elections on November 5. The second prediction is that, as a consequence, there will be a civil war in the country. Finally, I predict that, although the patriotic side will suffer a very hard blow with the result of either of the two scenarios of the first prediction, in the end it will win this confrontation, which will last for a certain time, the time necessary to calibrate the forces of the contenders.

In fact, these predictions are consistent with the Catholic prophecies about these apocalyptic times. In addition, they allow us to understand a context of political-social dynamics for their fulfillment. Here I will not make an exhaustive analysis of these prophecies, in which I believe, and I will only focus on the three predictions postulated, touching only in passing on some other ingredients present in the reality examined.

The three prophecies directly related to my predictions are the following. First, our Blessed Mother Mary, on October 5, 2015, gave the following prophecy to the renowned visionary Luz de María de Bonilla:

1. "The great nation of the north, the United States, will be communist without being so. It will abhor My Son and therefore will attract chaos to its people. Civil war will come, causing great pain to men. It is not far off that this will come to the United States."

The second prophecy to be noted in this article is the following, given by Jesus Christ to the same visionary on September 30, 2024:

2. “The Antichrist takes power over humanity that the elite gives him in total and absolute secrecy, starting on the second day of the month of October of the year 2024.”

The third relevant one here was revealed by Saint Michael the Archangel, also to Luz de María, on February 29, 2024:

3. “The precursor of the arrival of Elijah to earth is the Angel of Peace, who comes to open the way before the terrible actions of the Antichrist against the people of our King and Lord Jesus Christ.”

The first speaks of the civil war, which we will discuss here. The second, of the leader of the bad side of this conflict, who is already active, centralizing all the power in the world that he has control over since October 2. The third speaks of the leader of the good side of the conflict, the Angel of Peace, who will defeat, with an army that God will form for this purpose, the Antichrist and the forces of evil. It will be a factual conflict, which includes the political, the economic, the military and the spiritual, in which there will also be notable prodigies beyond the natural, both on the part of the army of evil, supported by Satan and the rest of the demons, and on the part of the army of good, supported by Saint Michael the Archangel and all the angels under his command. Similar to what happened with Saint Joan of Arc in her time, but much more widespread and with a final solution of triumph of good over evil.

Here we focus on the natural part of the conflicts, not on the supernatural, which includes the presence of alleged extraterrestrials (who are actually demons) and miracles of protection and provision of food in the army of good. But if someone wants to see the supernatural part in more detail and fully interpret the listed prophecies, I invite you to read the document on God's Plan for the apocalyptic times in the references [(1)]. My predictions, coming only from rational analysis, could fail in the details, with a margin of error, as occurs in scientific practice. What will not fail are the prophecies such as that of a great factual conflict and the triumph of good over evil, for which one must convert and approach God as soon as possible, under penalty of going to hell, even in this life, in the face of so many signs, natural, scientific and supernatural. Unequivocal signs that we have already entered the end of the bad times (not the end of history) and the beginning of the so-called Era of Peace that will restore the earth and humanity to times close to the earthly paradise.

2. Introduction to rational analysis: What system prevails in the United States. A democracy or a kleptocracy?

In order to analyze the issue of who would win the presidential election in the United States, it is crucial to determine whether it is a de jure or de facto conflict. If we are in a democracy, the will of the citizens decides, through their vote, who wins the election. But if we are in a dictatorship, what counts for the election is the decision of the dictator. In the case of dictatorships, elections are often used to give the appearance of democracy, not because it is doubted that the dictator will decide the result.

If there were a democracy in the United States, the prediction would be clear: Donald Trump would win. Such an assertion could be based, sufficiently, on only two indicators that measure the real intention to vote: the number of people who go to the respective political rallies, on the one hand, and on the polls, on the other, which include those of the results of the presidential and vice-presidential debates. It is worth noting that in a new generation war like the current one, both media reports and polls are a territory in which lies and manipulations of the truth abound. A reliable indicator is what the private sector believes will happen. In this sense, we give a reference below in which private bets give a probability of winning of 63% and 36% to Trump and Kamala Harris, respectively [(2)].

But in the United States there is no democracy, as we will show in the next section. In fact, there is something worse than a simple dictatorship: it is a kleptocracy, a system in which a group of criminals acts as dictator of the country.

3. The 2020 electoral fraud and the conclusion: the United States is no longer democratic

To make this statement about the political system prevailing in the United States, I base myself on two facts: one, that Joe Biden's government is not legitimate. This is a president who was imposed as a result of electoral fraud. My proof in this regard has a theoretical basis using economic tools, as can be seen in the document referenced below, entitled "Conspiracy and Fraud in the United States” [3]. There I use the Principal-Agent theory and Signaling Games to show that Biden's camp was not able to send a "costly signal" that would separate him as the winner: instead of being transparent and encouraging the verification of the result, as someone who is interested in showing his true "type" of player would do when there is asymmetric information, to clear up doubts, he dedicated himself from the moment the electoral result was given not only to systematically prevent any type of independent citizen investigation on the matter, but to politically and judicially persecute, from the State, those who have tried to clarify the related facts. The conclusion is robust, as demonstrated technically using the theories cited as a concrete application for this case, using the publicly available empirical evidence on the behavior of the two key agents in the conflict: the Biden camp and the Trump camp. While Joe Biden is convicted in the mock trial, Trump is acquitted. Trump is declared the winner of the election and is labeled the legitimate president, fraudulently stripped of his victory. Joe Biden, meanwhile, is labeled an illegitimate president, imposed by a coup d'état. A new generation coup, carried out not with military weapons, but with economic, media and quasi-legal weapons, including the electoral system corrupted in the determining places.

Since 2020, especially since the release of censorship as a result of Elon Musk's acquisition of X, abundant empirical evidence has been documented that clearly reaffirms the conclusion about the fraud that occurred at that time. Here is a small sample of many that can be found referenced in X, in an article entitled “The Scandal of the Century: How the Election Was Stolen” [(4)].

The conclusion reached is that the United States, from that moment on, ceased to be a democracy.

4. Theory of kleptocracy in the United States: rent-seeking as a system

In the cited document, I do something additional: I introduce the theory of a conspiracy to commit electoral fraud in 2020, carried out by a cartel of mafias. The arguments I present allow me to propose kleptocracy, carried out by a cartel of rent-seeking mafias, with national and international connections, as a new theoretical status quo applicable to the United States, an alternative to the democratic system. To do so, I extend the theory with which I characterize the Venezuelan sociopolitical reality, about rent-seeking as a system, in the presence of the sociopolitical disease called the Curse of Abundance. I conclude that the United States began to suffer from a variant of that disease in which rent-seeking prevails as a system.

In fact, really existing democracies have errors, and the State does not always serve its citizens exclusively. For example, in a democracy there are generally rent-seekers: businessmen who use their contacts in state institutions to gain advantages that allow them to compete favorably with their peers in the market, generating inefficiency through high prices and low or defective production. Rent-seeking as a system occurs when a group of rent-seekers captures the State as such, going far beyond the capture of some individual officials, and turns it into an instrument of their economic objectives. The country, in these circumstances, ceases to be a democracy, because instead of serving the citizens, its presumed owners, it begins to serve the aforementioned cartel of rent-seeking mafias. It thus becomes a kleptocratic system, in which, by definition, power is held by criminals, who do not obey the laws but their interests. This has serious consequences not only on the civil rights of citizens and on economic inefficiency and corruption in public institutions, but on their perpetuation over time, which we are talking about now.

5. Dynamics of the rent-seeking system

On this subject, in the cited document I also speak about the dynamic characteristics of the rent seeking system: it is a system with a central point called the “fixed point” that is stable, to which the entire country converges over time, with its public, national and local institutions, adapting accordingly.

Although the control of the presidency of the republic does not mean that the entire system is captured by the rent-seeking mafia cartel, that step changes, depending on the specific characteristics of the country, the systemic nature of its socio-political regime and its dynamic characteristics. This is the case of the United States, where the degree of penetration of the rent-seeking in its different institutions, at a general, regional and local level, has been so notable that the Deep State managed to carry out electoral fraud of that caliber.

Other previous examples of this penetration have to do with the control exercised over the country by the so-called “intelligence community,” which includes the CIA, the FBI and the National Security Agency, with its relations with the MOSSAD. Although we do not have conclusive evidence in this matter, we can use the presumption of guilt established in the aforementioned document on fraud as the status quo to analyze this. It is these agencies that have the burden of proof to prove that they are not guilty. Citizens, and investigators, can presume their guilt as a status quo theory. From that point of view, most of the conspiracy theories have ended up being true. Especially from the additional indications of guilt resulting from the many revelations that have come to public light in X. And these conspiracies also have a clear connection, the key to interpretation of which is the advancement in time of the described rent-seeking system. In that sense we can assume that these agencies are involved in the assassinations of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, the explosion of the Twin Towers in New York and the ouster of Richard Nixon as president of the United States. In addition to the infiltration of many institutions of the United States at national, regional and local levels. At the level of the US Congress, for example, we know of the denunciation of control of the majority of Republican congressmen by the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, connected to the MOSSAD, made by Congressman Thomas Massie.

The fraud of 2020 thus represents a definitive step forward that changes both the character of the US political system and its temporal dynamics. From now on, all institutions, at all levels, would tend to be captured by the respective mafia cartel. Which, by the way, could very well be called the “Deep State”, especially because of its international connotations.

If that is true, from that moment on it behaves like a “black hole” in astrophysics: all institutions eventually cross its edge, called “event horizon,” and begin to become part of the rent-seeking system. This is what the Democratic Party is pushing for the Supreme Court of Justice: significantly increasing the number of judges so that its political-economic agents can control, in this way, the collegiate body as a whole. The country as a whole would no longer leave the system by itself and tends to its center, the fixed point, in which absolutely all institutions, such as the governorships, Congress, the judicial system, the police and national security agencies, would be captured. Even if in appearance there is democracy and there are parties that are not directly dominated by the executive branch of the nation, the institution with the most power in the country. At this point we should realize that, in practice, the majority of the US Congress is captured by the rent-seeking system. Even before the capture of the national executive power with Joe Biden. If Kamala Harris is appointed president, the Supreme Court would be one step away from becoming another key institution captured by the rent-seeking system.

It is clear, from this point of view, that the fraud perpetrated with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, as president and vice president of the country, was key to initiating this convergence. So it is true that at that time the system changed its political character, from a democracy, to a kleptocracy, with its enveloping dynamics.

If this is so, only the advent of an exogenous shock to the system, with sufficient force, will be able to change it and impose an alternative. That could be, for example, the republican democratic system, which is also dynamic and stable, with a point of convergence, or fixed point, very different from that of the rent-seeking system: the one that the founders of that country conceived. It is the one that is embodied in the Constitution, with its amendments.

From this point of view, the insurrection predicted here would be carried out to rescue the republican democratic system. An endogenous shock, within the system, will not change the system. Some elections, even national ones, as in this case, have those characteristics. Not only do they not change the system, but they serve to reaffirm it, deceiving many people into believing that the system is democratic.

In order not to extend this article by analyzing the multiple ways in which fraud would be committed (media control, illegal immigration, false ballots, use of electoral machines to change the result), I will only reiterate that elections like these do not guarantee that we will leave the system imposed by the coup d'état, but rather strengthen it, even if the dictator, the Deep State, has a plan B to remain in power through some other puppet other than Kamala Harris. Such a plan would consist of infiltrating the high levels of a Donald Trump government, including the vice presidency, to use it for its purposes, seeking to assassinate the president-elect, to facilitate the action of infiltration.

In the event that Kamala Harris is imposed, the complaints of those who know that Donald Trump should win, according to the polls, etc., do not matter. It would happen like in Venezuela: despite the obvious fraud, plan A of reaffirming the original candidate of the rent-seeking system will most likely prevail.

It is in this context that we must see the attempts to assassinate Donald Trump, or to infiltrate him. Similarly, we can more fully understand the judicial processes to which this electoral candidate has been subjected, which have been based on set-ups to interfere in the election result. It also allows us to better understand the actions of agencies such as the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, which have been captured, some of them even before 2020, by the rent-seeking system.

6. Popular insurrection with patriotic military support

The conclusion so far allows us to predict that the Deep State is not going to let Trump take away the power that it has gained through a coup d'état and considers its own. Either because it would not let him win the presidency even though he has more votes or because it would try to assassinate him once he is declared as the winner. It is not going to give up power by fair means, by legal, peaceful means. Only by force, since this is a factual conflict, not a legal one.

The scenario of imposing Kamala Harris is quite possible, even if the fraud is very obvious. In this sense, it is worth noting that the Deep State, neither its agents in the government, nor in politics nor in the institutions they have captured, will care that American patriots, nor even the worldwide opinion of the informed citizens, know that another fraud is being carried out. Or that people like Robert Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard, Nicole Shanahan and many Democratic followers who are patriots have changed parties, observing the anti-democratic and openly dictatorial practices, as in this case, of the Biden and Kamala Harris camp. Or that Elon Musk, the world's opinion leader on social media, is in favor of Trump as the only hope to rescue democracy. Or that a significant majority of people well versed in economic, social, technological, medical, communicational, strategic and political issues on X, the most thriving media platform in the world, think the same and realize the fraud. Among them Tucker Carlson, General Michael Flynn and many doctors who exposed the nature of Covid and its vaccines.

The only way they will recognize an obvious victory for Trump is if they have the aforementioned plan B, of turning that candidate into a puppet of theirs. For example, through their support for the cause of Jewish Zionism, with its Antichrist, as we discuss below. In this scenario, they would plan the assassination attempt "better" than those they have carried out so far, to achieve something similar to what happened with John F. Kennedy. Or morally assassinate him, to achieve something similar to what they did with Richard Nixon. The vice president, in any case, the replacement, is vital here, as in the cases mentioned. The Deep State was already active and growing in power, as we now know, especially after the revelations that have emerged on X, Twitter after Elon Musk took control.

But I repeat that it is most likely that it will happen like in Venezuela, where, despite the fact that the vast majority voted for the opposition, Maduro was declared the winner by the electoral and judicial system, in addition to the military, with its geopolitical support. A puppet of the rent-seeking, which we call “red rent-seeking” because the mafia that runs the cartel has ties to Cuba, China, Russia, Iran, but the kleptocratic system itself is the same, with different bosses. The fraud in the US would also have support from the other countries already captured, in part or in whole, by the Deep State, such as Europe, Canada, etc.

With this result it will be even clearer, for patriots, both Republicans and Democrats, as well as independents, that the fight is not political, legal, de jure. It is de facto. In fact, the Deep State also knows that the patriotic side, for the most part, will know this. And it knows that they will try to organize a legitimate popular insurrection, with military and police support. That is why the Department of Defense issued an order in which armed forces can be used internally [See (3)], using lethal force, with the clear objective of using it to declare a state of siege when the result of Kamala Harris's "victory" is known, "to prevent Trump from organizing an anti-democratic insurrection."

But here the difference is marked, as we will now explain, because in the face of an event of this type, the Deep State will be defeated in the field of factual confrontation, as we will now explain. In Venezuela, an open fraud was able to be imposed with impunity because the people did not have weapons. In the United States, in contrast, the patriotic people are mostly legitimately armed. The legitimacy of such an act is based on the second amendment of the US Constitution, which states, verbatim:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

As if that were not enough, it is not controversial to estimate that the patriotic people have the support of at least half, probably more, of the military personnel. And the police. Although the Deep State controls the majority of the military leadership, and a deceived part of the citizenry, which would support, in practice, the Deep State in this conflict, the patriots are surely organizing themselves for the eventual confrontation by force. And they know that they have comparatively more de facto force, which would be evident after some skirmishes of confrontation to calibrate forces.

Although it is a very simple model, the game of Hawk and Chicken is very powerful and appropriate to analyze what would happen in this confrontation of de facto forces. The best way to imagine this game is to think of two cars that are going to collide head-on on a single-lane road. The only two options are to continue forward and to swerve to avoid a crash. The first option is the hawk option, which may result in a collision between the two cars. The second option is the chicken option, in which the player, feeling cowardly, swerves at the last moment to avoid a crash. The game is represented here, with its matrix of strategies and their corresponding results in terms of winnings for each player depending on the strategies each player plays.

		Deep State
		Hawk	Chicken
US Patriots	Hawk	(1 ; -1)	(10 ; 0)
	Chicken	(0 ; 10)	(5 ; 5)

The players are: the American Patriots, who play in the rows, and the Deep State, who play in the columns. The numbers in each cell of the matrix indicate what the rows player gets, first, and what the columns player gets, second, when the strategy profile corresponding to that cell is played by the players. The strategies available to each of the players are: playing confrontation (Hawk), or deviating to avoid a crash (Chicken).

For example, if both players deviate from the car crash course (play chicken), the payoffs will be 5 for the Patriots, and 5 for the Deep State. Those numbers would indicate that if played this way, each player keeps their car, which is worth 5. If the Deep State imposes Kamala Harris regardless of the actual result of the vote, and declares a state of siege, placing the army on the streets, it would be following the crash course in the game. If in this context the patriots stay home and do not carry out a popular insurrection, the Deep State wins 10 and the Patriots win 0. The player who plays confrontation keeps his car and also the other player's. The player who does not play confrontation in this case has to give up his car to the other player. A situation like this would indicate that the citizens lose democracy in their country and the Deep State keeps all the power.

It is useful for each reader to interpret the value of what each player gets for the rest of the possible strategy profiles. From the point of view of a democratic republic, the ideal would be that the Deep State did not control the country and that the citizens had all the power, through the rulers they choose in democratic elections. In that ideal scenario, citizens would win 10 and the Deep State should win 0. The latter is so because this player represents in this factual game the interests of the cartel of business mafias that want to exploit all the country's potential through the puppets they control in the State. The profits of the private businesses in a country should come from their productive effort in the market, not from their political influences, for which they should not have any income. Such political profits are called rents in Economics, to assimilate them to the concept of monopoly rents, which are not efficient for the market or for the country.

An interesting, and crucial, payoff profile is what occurs when the two players decide not to deviate, but to play confrontation, "Hawk-Hawk." Neither plays chicken. The patriotic side would not be persuaded by the declaration of a state of siege, with the presence of government military troops on the street, to accept the verdict of Kamala Harris' victory. It would not accept fraud for good. The key to interpreting the payoff profile depicted in the matrix in this case is that if the patriots play chicken, they would lose more than if they play confrontation. If they accept the fraud, they would win 0, zero, he would lose the country. And that would harm his children, his honor, etc. If he confronts, he would lose part of the 5 he had. His car would be battered by the crash. But in the end he would be left with 1, with his honor and his future, which is better than 0, with his present and his future in tatters.

On the other hand, the Deep State, with the crash, would end up with -1 at the end of the confrontation, instead of 0. To interpret it, we can reiterate here that the Deep State is made up of corrupt elites, a small group. Many deceived people who follow them would realize the reality at the end and would not support them in an armed confrontation. In the confrontation, the patriotic side would win more, in relative terms, given its greater relative factual strength. Although the civil war is something that would last for a while, in the end the Deep State would deviate and play “chicken” and be defeated. The territory, although battered, would remain in the hands of the Patriots.

Let us use the standard concept for predicting what will be played in a given game, the “Nash equilibrium” one. It makes sense as a predictor, since in it each player, given what the other players are expected to play, plays the best response strategy.

Coming to what we wanted to conclude this section, the only Nash equilibrium in this game would be one in which the Patriots play “Hawk” and the Deep State plays “Chicken.” It is clear that the players should have a more or less clear idea of ​​what they would get in each case. If everyone had a clear idea of ​​what would happen in the end, there would be no confrontation, since one of the players (the Deep State) would deviate before the cars crashed. But in practice, the reality is more complex, and it is to be expected that there will be a skirmish to calibrate forces to obtain that information. This skirmish can be interpreted as the civil war predicted, on the one hand, and prophesied, on the other. The two things are consistent, as promised. Of course, the payoffs in the predicted scenario could change a bit, due to the fact that the war could leave the patriotic side's tanks in tatters. But there are honor and psychological issues to be considered for the victory. And spiritual issues, which are beyond rational analysis: in such a war, the side of good will be protected by angelic forces.

7. Summary and final considerations: Beyond the rational and the natural

Here I postulate that what has been rationally analyzed allows us to concretely interpret the content of the three prophecies listed at the beginning. First, the civil war and the de facto communist character, beyond appearances, of the United States. The latter especially since the coup d'état of 2020. Not only because of the coup, but because of the persecution of political opponents and the attacks and prohibitions of freedom of expression. As in the famous case of Twitter.

Regarding the duration of the civil war, it is possible that it will extend to about three years, which will last the "Great Tribulation" of the book of Revelation. But it may be less. God's Plan contemplates, after the Illumination of Conscience, a definitive decanting of forces between good and evil. The innocent and the faithful people will be protected. But there will be an army of good on a global level, with regional and local expressions, commanded by Henry V of the Cross, which is the name of the Angel of Peace, who will defeat the army of evil commanded by the Antichrist. This is when nuclear war will occur. The forces of good will be protected within “Mobile Refuges”, Noah’s Arks of war in this new universal flood, now of fire.

In the United States, the conflict for power would be part of this global war, and would be commanded by the patriotic forces that are fighting for the restoration of the democratic republic, in the face of the usurpation of the forces of evil, commanded by the Deep State and its political arms, especially the Democratic Party.

To obtain a much more complete view, if one has faith, as well as reason, one must realize that these are defining times of the end of an era, the era of evil, and the beginning of another, the Era of Peace, which will restore the earth and the human race to times similar to the Earthly Paradise. In which the Will of God will prevail and its inhabitants will be healed and rejuvenated, being able to perform unheard-of miracles, even above those performed by Jesus in His time, as He himself promised. The countries would be different: there would be twelve kingdoms, with a global kingdom that integrates them. The king will be Henry V of the Cross. The United States will probably be united with Canada and Mexico. Central America and South America could form another kingdom. The same for Europe. The Middle East. Russia and neighboring countries. Asia, including China, Japan, and Korea. India and Pakistan. Africa and Oceania.

Satan and all the demons will be confined to hell for about a thousand years. Before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, where the end of the world will occur and Paradise will be completely restored.

One last note: the presence of the Antichrist commanding the forces of evil implies that the payment matrix of the game presented cannot be based only on physical forces. They necessarily have to include forces beyond the natural. Since the Angel of Peace, the contender of the Antichrist in the forces of good, is present, with the support of Archangel Saint Michael, the relative superior forces on the side of good are well represented. It is true that Satan supports the Antichrist, so he has a lot of physical strength and beyond the natural (including the action of the alleged extraterrestrials, who exist and will be used in this war, but are demons). But Archangel Saint Michael supports the Angel of Peace, and His forces come directly from God, the Almighty.

So we are very privileged. We just have to choose the good side of this fight, that of Jesus, King of the Universe.

Note and references:

• Felipe Pérez Martí has ​​a Ph.D. in Economics at the University of Chicago. His thesis advisor was Robert Lucas, winner of the Nobel Prize in 1995.

1. God's Plan for apocalyptic times: https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/El_Plan_de_Dios_para_los_tiempos_apocal%C3%ADpticos

2. https://x.com/Politics_Polls/status/1848601557786370156?t=Zht97OYTTTUIEMraGbSvEQ&s=08

https://x.com/BillyM2k/status/1850734316986450388

3. Conspiracy and fraud in the US: https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/Conspiraci%C3%B3n_y_fraude_en_EEUU

4. A sample regarding the evidence on the 2020 electoral fraud: “The scandal of the century: how the election was stolen” https://x.com/Real_RobN/status/1843476764087202200?t=qIEkMciInfwM1kvJWAH_Ow&s=19

5. https://x.com/tyrannideris/status/1846246281544397307